The Ergosphere
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
 

Scamwatch: Steorn

When things get tough, people get desperate.  Desperate people will grasp at straws for solutions to their problems.  Consider the worthless remedies obtained (sometimes at ruinous cost) by people with cancer.  Laetrile and "psychic surgery" just begin the list.  The money spent on these nostrums has made some of the scammers wealthy.

When the problem is lack or excessive cost of energy, the list isn't constrained by regulators preventing the unlicensed practice of medicine.  People still sell "fuel-line magnets", and apparently have buyers.  Even the legend of the 200 MPG carburetor appears to have new life in it.

In areas served by gas-fired electric generators, both heating fuel and electricity are becoming very expensive and even scarce.  With North Sea gas declining steeply, one harsh winter could leave Britain in crisis.  It shouldn't be too surprising that the inevitable worry this engenders has produced "solutions" of questionable merit.

Steorn (http://www.steorn.net/frontpage/default.aspx) is touting a new version of the "free energy from magnets" scam.  The history of failure behind these devices discourages them not at all; they claim:

We have developed a technology that produces free, clean and constant energy.

This means never having to recharge your phone, never having to refuel your car. A world with an infinite supply of clean energy for all.

Our technology has been independently validated by engineers and scientists - always off the record, always proven to work.

(Emphasis in original.)

It should make one wonder, though:  why "always off the record"?  What's wrong with their invention that nobody will back the claim of verification with their own reputation?

The obvious conclusion is that Steorn is a scam.  The reason you should know it's a scam is because electromagnetic devices work according to Maxwell's equations.  Maxwell's equations are conservative (any energy coming out has to have been put in somewhere, and by known means); if anyone found a violation of them it would have been Nobel prize material from the moment of discovery.

Nobody's collected that Nobel.  No papers have been printed.  Nobody's even declared an anomalous phenomenon (like the inability of gravitational contraction to explain the apparent lifespan of the Sun, which was finally explained by hydrogen fusion after the discovery of E=mc^2).

All Steorn has done is issue a "challenge" to scientists.  They want to "choose twelve and negotiate terms", which is a code phrase for picking the credulous instead of the thorough.  Producing one working example and letting it do the proving for them appears to be beyond them.

If they can't even make one, what makes anyone think they could possibly make enough to save the world?

Hold onto your wallet.  Save your money for something like John Cooper's direct-carbon fuel cells.  You might note that he is not afraid to tell the world how they work.  That's the difference between invention and fraud.

 
Talk largely about energy and work, but also politics and other random thoughts


Mail Engineer-Poet

(If you're mailing a question, is it already in the FAQ?)

Important links

The FAQ
Glossary
The Reference Library

Blogchild of

Armed and Dangerous

Blogparent of

R-Squared




The best prospect for our energy future:
Flibe Energy

ARCHIVES
January 1990 / February 2004 / March 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / August 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / April 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / February 2015 / April 2015 / October 2015 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / February 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / September 2017 /


Powered by Blogger

RSS feed

Visits since 2006/05/11: